Motorcyclists’ Lane Splitting Is Legal But May Limit Crash Damages

Motorcyclists’ Lane Splitting Is Legal But May Limit Crash Damages

Lane splitting, often referred to as "white-lining," is the practice where motorcyclists ride between lanes of slow-moving or stopped traffic. This maneuver allows motorcyclists to navigate through congested roadways more efficiently. While lane splitting is illegal in many U.S. states, California stands out as the only state where this practice is explicitly permitted. However, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has established specific guidelines for lane splitting, and a motorcyclist’s deviation from them can affect recovery of damages in a lawsuit following an accident.

According to CHP guidelines, motorcyclists engaging in lane splitting must do so in a manner that is safe and prudent. The guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining a speed differential of no more than 10 MPH faster than surrounding traffic and discourage lane splitting at speeds over 30 MPH. Motorcyclists also must continue to obey all standard traffic laws, including speed limits and signals. Despite these regulations, accidents can still occur, raising complex questions about fault and liability.

In the aftermath of an accident involving lane splitting, determining fault hinges on the specific circumstances. Careless lane splitting, such as weaving aggressively between vehicles, failing to signal, or excessive speeding, can significantly impact the evaluation of a motorcyclist's negligence. If a motorcyclist’s behavior is deemed negligent, it can reduce the damages they are entitled to recover in a personal injury claim.

Under California's comparative negligence rule, an injured motorcyclist retains the right to sue for damages even if they are partially at fault for the accident. A judge or jury will assign a percentage of fault to each party involved and the motorcyclist’s compensation will then be reduced proportionally. If a motorcyclist is found to be 30 percent at fault due to careless lane splitting, and their total damages amount to $100,000, they would still recover $70,000.

An experienced motorcycle accident attorney can make a strong case for showing the motorcyclist's fault to be less than that of other parties involved. This may involve gathering and presenting evidence such as traffic camera footage, witness statements and expert testimony to reconstruct the accident and demonstrate the other driver’s greater responsibility. The attorney may also emphasize factors like the other driver’s potential distractions, violations of traffic laws or failure to check blind spots, all of which can shift more fault away from the motorcyclist.

Pulverman & Pulverman, LLP, based in Santa Barbara, California, represents motorcyclists throughout the Central Coast of California who have been injured in accidents caused by negligent drivers. Call us at 805-962-0397 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.

Motorcyclists’ Lane Splitting Is Legal But May Limit Crash Damages

Lane splitting, often referred to as "white-lining," is the practice where motorcyclists ride between lanes of slow-moving or stopped traffic. This maneuver allows motorcyclists to navigate through congested roadways more efficiently. While lane splitting is illegal in many U.S. states, California stands out as the only state where this practice is explicitly permitted. However, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has established specific guidelines for lane splitting, and a motorcyclist’s deviation from them can affect recovery of damages in a lawsuit following an accident.

According to CHP guidelines, motorcyclists engaging in lane splitting must do so in a manner that is safe and prudent. The guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining a speed differential of no more than 10 MPH faster than surrounding traffic and discourage lane splitting at speeds over 30 MPH. Motorcyclists also must continue to obey all standard traffic laws, including speed limits and signals. Despite these regulations, accidents can still occur, raising complex questions about fault and liability.

In the aftermath of an accident involving lane splitting, determining fault hinges on the specific circumstances. Careless lane splitting, such as weaving aggressively between vehicles, failing to signal, or excessive speeding, can significantly impact the evaluation of a motorcyclist's negligence. If a motorcyclist’s behavior is deemed negligent, it can reduce the damages they are entitled to recover in a personal injury claim.

Under California's comparative negligence rule, an injured motorcyclist retains the right to sue for damages even if they are partially at fault for the accident. A judge or jury will assign a percentage of fault to each party involved and the motorcyclist’s compensation will then be reduced proportionally. If a motorcyclist is found to be 30 percent at fault due to careless lane splitting, and their total damages amount to $100,000, they would still recover $70,000.

An experienced motorcycle accident attorney can make a strong case for showing the motorcyclist's fault to be less than that of other parties involved. This may involve gathering and presenting evidence such as traffic camera footage, witness statements and expert testimony to reconstruct the accident and demonstrate the other driver’s greater responsibility. The attorney may also emphasize factors like the other driver’s potential distractions, violations of traffic laws or failure to check blind spots, all of which can shift more fault away from the motorcyclist.

Pulverman & Pulverman, LLP, based in Santa Barbara, California, represents motorcyclists throughout the Central Coast of California who have been injured in accidents caused by negligent drivers. Call us at 805-962-0397 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.

Contact the Firm

!
!
!